• Users Online: 182
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 165-168

Comparison of patient and graft survival in tacrolimus versus cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive regimes in renal transplant recipients – Single-center experience from South India


Department of Nephrology, NU Hospitals, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Kiran Chandra Patro
Department of Nephrology, NU Hospitals, Bengaluru, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijot.ijot_6_18

Get Permissions

Studies have shown better graft function and reduced acute rejection rates among renal transplant recipients who were on Tacrolimus (Tac)-based immunosuppression regimens as compared to cyclosporine (CsA)-based regimens in the first year. However, the long-term follow-up data did not reveal better outcomes in the Tac-based regimens. In view of the short term benefits, the trend has been to change to Tac-based regimens off late. Data from the Indian subcontinent are, however, sparse. We, therefore, looked at our data to ascertain if Tac-based regimen does have better outcomes in our population. We studied a total of 108 individuals who underwent renal transplantation between January 2007 and June 2013, with a mean follow-up of 38.22 months (comparable to both groups). In our group, males constituted 77.8%,; and among the 108 individuals, 16.7% were diabetics. New-onset diabetes after renal transplantation was more common in the Tac group (21 vs. 12 and was statistically significant [P = 0.03]). At the last follow-up, serum creatinine was higher in the CsA group (1.77 mg/dl vs. 1.35 mg/dl) and was statistically significant (P = 0.03). Individuals requiring hemodialysis were also significantly higher in the CsA group (9 vs. 2; P = 0.05). The patient survival was similar in both groups (1-year and 5-year follow-up); however, graft survival was better in Tac group as compared to CsA group (0.94 vs. 0.88 at 1 year and 0.85 vs. 0.72 at 5 years).


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed172    
    Printed2    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded44    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal